27-01-2019 A REAL COMPANION IN OUR LIFE ....

A SOUL MATE TO NIRWANA


प्यार शब्दों का मोहताज नहीं होता ,
दिल में हर किसी का राज नहीं होता ,
क्यों इंतज़ार करते हैं सभी Velentine DAY KA
.क्या साल का हर दिन प्यार का हकदार नहीं होता ?

Without Love -days are.
sad day,
moan day,
tears day,
waste day,
thirst day,
fright day ;
shatter day.

 So be in लव everyday 

मेरे कंधे पे रख के सिर , उंघते हुए
उस ने पूछा के कब तक अपने कंधे पे सोने दोगे "
मैंने हँसते हुए कहा जब तक , लोग
 मुझे कन्धा देने नहीं आ जाते ..!!!!

The most valuable things in life are not measured in monetary terms

. The really important things are not houses and lands, stocks and bonds, automobiles and real state, but friendships, trust, confidence, empathy, mercy, love and faith.

A SPIRITUAL REVELATION .........


There was a rich merchant who had four wives. He loved the 4th wife the most and adorned her with rich robes & jewels.  and treated her to the best of the "delicacies." every day! He took great care of her and gave her nothing but the best.

He also loved the 3rd wife, who was very beautiful, and attractive . He was very proud of her as  her precious possession , and always wanted to show off her to his friends. However, the merchant was  always in great fear that "she might run away with some other men".

He  loved his 2nd wife. as well, As  She was a very considerate person, always patient and in fact is the merchant's confidante adviser too . Whenever the merchant faced some problems, he always turned to his 2nd wife and she would always help him out and tide him through difficult times. By her wise counsel .

Now, the merchant's 1st wife  who was a very loyal partner and has made great contributions in maintaining his wealth and business as well along with taking care of the household. However, the merchant did not love the first wife and although she loved him deeply, he hardly took notice of her.

One day, the merchant fell ill. Before long, he knew that he was going to die soon. He thought of his luxurious life and told himself, "Now I have 4 wives with me. But when I die, I'll be alone. How lonely I'll be!"

Thus, he asked the 4th wife, "I loved you most, endowed you with the finest clothing and showered great care over you. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and keep me company?" "No way!"  every one has to die one day , why should some one else die for you? replied the 4th wife and she walked away without another word.

The answer cut like a sharp knife right into the merchant's heart. The sad and dejected merchant then asked the same question to 3rd wife, "I have loved you so much for all my life. Now that I'm dying, will you follow me and give me company to heaven?" "No!" replied the 3rd wife. "Life is so good over here! I have many good friends here, I'm going to remarry when you die!" The merchant's heart sank and turned cold.

He then asked the 2nd wife, "I always turned to you for help and your advice, you've always helped me out. Now I need your help again. When I die, will you follow me and keep me company?" "I'm sorry, I can't help you out this time!" replied the 2nd wife. "At the very most, I can only send you to your grave." spend some time at your grave off and on but dying with you is not in my mind at all. The answer came like a bolt of thunder and the merchant was devastated. He was wondering over his worldly relations , how hollow they have been?

Then suddenly silence broke,  a voice called out : "I'll leave with you. I'll follow you no matter where you go." The merchant looked up and there was his first wife. She was so skinny, almost like she suffered from malnutrition. Greatly grieved, the merchant said, "I should have taken much better care of you than I  have given you !" I ignored you all my life but you still love me and want to sacrifice for me ?
This is a symbolic narration to reveal the truth hidden behind it 
Actually, we all have 4 wives in our lives


(1) The 4th wife is our body. No matter how much time and effort we lavishly spend in making it look good, it'll leave us when we die.

(2) Our 3rd wife ? Our possessions, status and wealth. When we die, they all desert us and  are grabbed by our legal heirs.

(3) The 2nd wife is our immediate family and friends. No matter how close they had been there for us when we're alive, the furthest they can stay by us is up to the grave. And torch our funeral .

(4) The 1st wife is in fact our soul, often neglected & undernourished in our life long pursuit of materialistic things, wealth and sensual pleasures.


 IT IS IRONY THAT, It is actually the only thing that follows us wherever we go. Perhaps it's a good idea to cultivate and strengthen it now rather than to wait until we're on our death bed to repent later .

 

If you make a list of all the things that you consider were sins committed by you ? let's say, any five major religions, then you will understand that to be alive is a bigger sin! So, if you don't feel guilty about something, you may not go to the temple or church or mosque?
Fear and guilt have been two tools with which religion has been running &; attracting people for a long time. If there is no fear in people, there is no guilt in people and then very few would go to these places. Most of us go to such places because there is fear, guilt and greed or repentance of some past deeds ? .
We are used to follow certain ways of life that have made the fundamental processes of life as sinful; and that makes us feel always guilty. As a result, you see yourself always going to the temple or church or mosque and pay the necessary money and respect.and feel relieved of your "PRESSURE OF ILL KARMAS"


Do whatever you want, but understand that for every action that you undertake, there has to be a reaction as consequence.? Every single action: whether physical, mental, emotional or whatever you perform, has a consequence. The only question is whether you are ready for the consequence.? or a reaction?

If you can bear the consequence joyfully, do whatever you please. If you are the kind who will cry when the consequential fruit comes, then you need to calibrate your actions before going ahead. If you are the kind of person who thinks no matter what happens, even if you are going to be hanged tomorrow, you will still go blissfully.
There is no sin as such.

After all lot of dacoits and smugglers believe them to be right from their heart and never shy away from committing crimes, they have their own parameters of "KARMAS"  So, does it mean everything is punniya? No. No `papam', no `punniyam.' It's all made up by people to keep you under check and control. Your sense is the best control, not guilt. I believe human intelligence is able to control itself.

There is no need for some external force to control you.
If you allow your intelligence to function, it will control you, and more  practically &beautifully. It will bring sense to your life. And you will live a happy and contented life.

  When a person tries to tell lies as a casual hobby, It becomes his/her conscious  habit in the long run in life, TO lie with so precision & perfection that even the most inteligent people cant catch his/her lies except a lie detector ?.According to medical science this is a mental disorder, reasons could be many , But it is for sure that IT can be injurious not only to His/Her family life but also to psychic health,of the lier,,,schizophrenia may be the next stage for such perfect liers.

 All Relations are just Like an LIFE Insurance Policy... We have to Pay the Regular Premium  in the currency of "Affectionate Feelings," Love, Care & Respect" all around us , to keep the Relations/Policy alive and in force ? We have to be very particular  in giving due cares to our premiums. When we mature? We Live a better Life & Avail benefits during our Old age or care of our family in case of our Tragic inabilities.

 

 

 

 

 

HONESTY OR NOT IN JUDICIARY ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: AHRC News [mailto:listadmin@ahrchk.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 4:25 PM
To: kashyap@citizensvigilanceforum.com 
Subject: INDIA: Test of honesty for the country's judiciary or an ode on its demise


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
AHRC-STM-200-2010 
September 28, 2010 

A Statement by the Asian Human Rights Commission 

INDIA: Test of honesty for the country's judiciary or an ode on its demise 

The contempt of court proceedings initiated against Advocate Prashant Bushan in the Supreme Court of India for the allegations he made against some of the former Chief Justices of the country will test the maturity of India's judicial system and that of its democratic framework. Indeed the Court has a statutory right to initiate proceedings against anyone, suo motu or through a petition presented before it. So have Prashant, and every other citizen in the country, a right to express their opinion of what they believe is to be true. Unfortunately, the tainted image of the Indian judiciary is one among them, whether the judges like it or not. 

In an interview with Thelka magazine, published on 5 September 2010, Prashant alleged, "… that out of the last 16 to 17 Chief Justices, half have been corrupt". Through an Amicus Curiae petition filed by a lawyer, Mr. Harish Salve, the Supreme Court of India issued notice to Prashant asking him to show cause why his statement and opinion should not be treated as 'contempt of court'. 

Prashant's affidavit filed in reply to the contempt proceedings reiterate, explain and further name some of the 'tainted' judges. All of those who have been named, to clear their name if they can, must undergo a thorough investigation and a public trial by an impartial tribunal. Indeed it is to be seen whether the Indian judiciary, or any other democratic institution worthy of its salt and name (as democratic) will be willing to take this 'risk'. 

Prashant's original opinion, further reiterated and explained in his affidavit is nothing but a detailed narration of the reasons why the average Indian fear that the country's judiciary, in particular its Apex Court, has become unworthy of the maxim it claims to uphold, 'Yaddo Dharmastho Jayah', the Devnagari equivalent of fiat justitia ruat caelum. Indeed Prashant being a lawyer, is privileged to possess 'written, documentary and oral' evidence to substantiate his apprehensions than the aam admi (ordinary person), who face the worst brunt, should the judiciary of the country, the working for which his tax money is used is indeed corrupt. 

Judiciary's negation of every attempt to bring 'fresh air and light into (its) dark and dusty corridors of power' has become its deplorable character during the past decade. By preventing all attempts to bring transparency in the functioning of the court, ranging from the question of appointment of judges to the applicability of the Right to Information Act, 2005, the Indian judiciary has behaved in such fashion as if it has indeed embarrassing things to hide behind its elevated dais where the most paid and immune jurists in the largest democracy of the world are seated. These attempts have reduced the Indian judiciary into despicable situations where on one occasion it had a serving judge, transferred and later elevated to the Apex Court while unambiguous allegations of material corruption were made against him based on which there was an audit objection and an impeachment proceeding. The Supreme Court also had the unique opportunity to direct its own Registrar to file an ap peal against the order of a subordinate court, the Delhi High Court, in the Supreme Court, so that it could affirm the absoluteness of its impunity against public accountability at the expense of the taxpayer's money. 

The Court has also the record of 'legally and fatally injuring' everyone who dared to suggest that the 'king is naked' using its sword of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. This law, based on a medieval mental framework, has no place in a democracy, like a judiciary that despises transparency and decries accountability. 

The allegation Prashant has made is just not an Indian issue. For instance a former Chief Justice of India, Mr. A. M. Ahmedi, was nominated to serve in international committees. He was appointed to look into human rights violations in East Timor by the United Nations, to assist the judiciary in Liberia by the International Court of Justice, and has been requested to review the state of relations between the judiciary, the legal profession and the executive and violation of human rights in Zimbabwe by the International Bar Association. Any argument that Ahmedi would do justice to the victims of human rights violations in foreign lands, while he has allegedly robbed the same for sheer self-interest and greed from his countrymen (and women) does not hold water. Ahmedi's case is just one among many that must be investigated.

It is often said that making public statements of the above nature against the judiciary of a country is immature. Some may ask, will such statements help in sorting out the mess that has now surfaced? Is it not amateur and nonprofessional to say these things in such emphatic tone? The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) believes that the professionalism of the civil society is demonstrated in its ability to raise timely questions of rule of law, with an expectation that it would generate a worthy public debate in the country where it is engaged. 

Unfortunately, most of India's media are observing their characteristic silence on the issue. They have apparently perfected their art of stirring public opinion for the wrong cause using all the wrong methods, as they demonstrated in dealing with the parliament attack case, where they proved the case against the 'suspects', parroting the confession statement of the accused, extracted by some of the dreaded criminals wearing police uniforms, who practiced some of the most inhuman methods upon the accused, including torture. Indeed the Indian judiciary convicted the accused, despite the prosecution failing to prove their case, an act by which the judiciary too reiterated that pride and speculation rules above justice. 

The AHRC supports and congratulates Prashant Bushan for the bold initiative that he has taken by calling for openness and transparency in one of the most immune public institutions of the world. It is now the responsibility of India's civil society to wake up from its slumber and augment this process of fastening public accountability to one of India's oldest constitutional institutions. It is the primary responsibility of the lawyers and judges who believes in the rule of law and democracy to publically support the process Prashant has initiated. 

The AHRC requests everyone to sign an online petition created for the purpose. 

To say the least, if the allegations made by Prashant do not lead into an impartial, prompt and public investigation, it has to be believed that the democracy is dead in India. 

* The affidavit filed by Prashant Bushan is available here.
* The affidavit filed by Santhi Bushan is available here.
* The online petition can be accessed here. 


# # # 

About AHRC: The Asian Human Rights Commission is a regional non-governmental organisation monitoring and lobbying human rights issues in Asia. The Hong Kong-based group was founded in 1984. 





AHRC New Weekly Digest - an easy way to receive all your Human Rights news in just one weekly email - subscribe here.
-----------------------------
Asian Human Rights Commission
19/F, Go-Up Commercial Building,
998 Canton Road, Kowloon, Hongkong S.A.R.
Tel: +(852) - 2698-6339 Fax: +(852) - 2698-6367
facebook/twitter/youtube: humanrightsasia